| 吴 蓉,候林丽,郎锋祥,肖莹洁,邹 武,徐 鹏.不同水质评价方法在遂川江的应用比较[J].江西水利科技,2019,(6): |
| 不同水质评价方法在遂川江的应用比较 |
| Application of different water quality evaluation methods in water quality evaluation of Suichuan river |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 遂川江 水质评价 单因子评价法 综合水质标识指数法 水污染指数法 |
| 英文关键词: Suichuan river Single factor evaluation method Comprehensive water quality index method Water pollution index method |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 571 |
| 全文下载次数: 645 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为全面客观地了解遂川江的水质现状，采用2011～2018年6个断面的监测数据，选取单因子评价法、综合水质标识指数法和水污染指数法，分析遂川江水质现状及其水质时空变化趋势.水质标识指数法和水污染指数法较单因子评价法具有定量评价的优势，更能具体反应遂川江水质的整体水平，能够全面、科学、合理的对遂川江水质状况进行描述.3种方法的评价结果均表明，遂川江各断面历年水质均达相应水功能区标准，水质状况良好，无明显污染物. |
| 英文摘要: |
| In order to comprehensively and objectively grasp the current water quality of the Suichuan river，this paper adopts the monitoring data of six sections of the Suichuan river from 2011 to 2018，and selects three water quality evaluation methods，namely single factor evaluation method，comprehensive water quality identification index method and water pollution index method，to analyze the current water quality of the Suichuan river and the spatial-temporal change trend of water quality.Water quality identification index method and water pollution index method have the advantages of quantitative evaluation compared with single factor evaluation method，which can more specifically reflect the overall level of water quality of the river and describe the water quality of the river comprehensively，scientifically and reasonably.The results of the three methods show that the water quality of each section of the Suichuan river has reached the corresponding water functional zone standards over the years，and the water quality is good，the water quality meets the standard，and there are no obvious pollutants． |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
